Nexus between CSR and Firm Performance: Moderating Effect of Ownership Concentration

Authors

  • Van Chien Nguyen Institute of Materials Science, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Vietnam

Keywords:

CSR, social responsibility, Vietnam, firm performance, ROA, leverage, firm size

Abstract

The primary objective of this study is to examine the association between CSR activities and firm performance in the context of Vietnam. This study also aims to determine the moderating effect of ownership concentration on the association between CSR activities and firm performance. This research has followed a quantitative design given the fact that companies’ CSR initiatives and performance has been measured and tested for relationship and impact. The data for this research paper has been obtained from thirty firms operating in Vietnam for the period ranging from 2015 to 2019. Generalised Least Squares (GLS) is used as the major analysis technique in order to understand the moderating role of ownership concentration in explaining the impact of CSR on company performance. It was found that company’s expenditure on CSR activities is positively reflected in their financial performance. The secondary studies have also incorporated the role of ownership concentration in explaining the relationship of CSR and firm performance. However, the findings of this study have suggested otherwise as no significant moderating role of ownership concentration was found in explaining the impact of CSR on firm performance in the case of Vietnamese firms.

References

Agyemang, O. S., & Ansong, A. (2017). Journal of Global Responsibility. Journal of Global Responsibility, 8(1), 47-62.

Anser, M. K., Zhang, Z., & Kanwal, L. (2018). Moderating effect of innovation on corporate social responsibility and firm performance in realm of sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(5), 799-806.

Asrar-ul-Haq, M., Kuchinke, K. P., & Iqbal, A. (2017). The relationship between corporate social responsibility, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment: Case of Pakistani higher education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 2352-2363.

Bolton, D., & Landells, T. (2015). Reconceptualizing power relations as sustainable business practice. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(7), 604-616.

Budsaratragoon, P., & Jitmaneeroj, B. (2019). Measuring causal relations and identifying critical drivers for corporate sustainability: the quadruple bottom line approach. Measuring Business Excellence, 23 (3), 292-316

Carroll, A. B. (2016). Carroll’s pyramid of CSR: taking another look. International journal of corporate social responsibility, 1(1), 1-8.

Darus, F., Isa, N. H. M., Yusoff, H., & Arshad, R. (2015). Corporate governance and business capabilities: Strategic factors for corporate social responsibility reporting. Journal of Accounting and Auditing: Research & Practice, 1(1), 1-9.

Heslin, P. A., & Ochoa, J. D. (2008). Understanding and developing strategic corporate social responsibility. Organizational Dynamics, 37, 125-144.

Ishtiaq, M., Latif, K., Khan, A. N., & Noreen, R. (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance: The Moderating Effect of Ownership Concentration. Journal of Managerial Sciences, 11(3), 353-386.

Manes-Rossi, F., Tiron-Tudor, A., Nicolò, G., & Zanellato, G. (2018). Ensuring more sustainable reporting in Europe using non-financial disclosure—De facto and de jure evidence. Sustainability, 10(4), 1162.

Manzani, Y. E., Sidmou, M. L., & Cegarra, J. J. (2017). A conceptual framework of the relationship between total quality management, corporate social responsibility, innovation capability, and financial performance. International Journal of Quality and Innovation, 3(2-4), 188-208.

Maqbool, S., & Zameer, M. N. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: An empirical analysis of Indian banks. Future Business Journal, 4(1), 84-93.

Martinez-Conesa, I., Soto-Acosta, P., & Palacios-Manzano, M. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and its effect on innovation and firm performance: An empirical research in SMEs. Journal of cleaner production, 142, 2374-2383.

Sial, M. S., Chunmei, Z., Khan, T., & Nguyen, V. K. (2018a). Corporate social responsibility, firm performance and the moderating effect of earnings management in Chinese firms. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration. 10(2/3), 184-199.

Sial, M. S., Zheng, C., Khuong, N. V., Khan, T., & Usman, M. (2018b). Does firm performance influence corporate social responsibility reporting of Chinese listed companies?. Sustainability, 10(7), 2217.

Taghian, M., D’Souza, C., & Polonsky, M. (2015). A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility, reputation and business performance. Social Responsibility Journal, 11 (2), 340-363

Van Thanh, P., & Podruzsik, S. (2018). CSR in Developing Countries: Case Study in Vietnam. Management, 13(4), 287-300.

Yoon, B., & Chung, Y. (2018). The effects of corporate social responsibility on firm performance: A stakeholder approach. Journal of hospitality and tourism management, 37, 89-96.

Zhu, Q., Zou, F., & Zhang, P. (2019). The role of innovation for performance improvement through corporate social responsibility practices among small and medium‐sized suppliers in C hina. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(2), 341-350.

Downloads

Published

2019-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles