|Focus & Scope|
|Peer Review Process|
|Open Access Policy|
Focus and Scope
An objective of the Arthatama: Journal of Business Management and Accounting is to promote the wide dissemination of the results of systematic scholarly inquiries into the broad field of business research. Arthatama: Journal of Business Management and Accounting accepts articles in any business management and accounting related subjects and any research methodology that meet the standards established for publication in the journal. The primary, but not exclusive, audiences are academicians, graduate students, practitioners, and others interested in business research.
Arthatama: Journal of Business Management and Accounting invites manuscripts on various topics including functional areas of marketing management, management accounting, management control systems, information management systems, international business, business economics, business ethics and sustainability, entrepreneurship, financial management, strategic management, operations management, human resource management, e-business, knowledge management.
- Open Submissions
- Peer Reviewed
Peer Review Process
Arthatama: Journal of Business Management and Accounting uses an online submission and review system. Submission and peer review of each article must be managed using this system and based on the Peer Review Policy. Articles will be published if they strictly follow the author guidelines and preparation of the manuscript. Arthatama Editorial Board: The Journal of Business Management and Accounting is responsible for the selection of papers and the selection of reviewers. Generally, articles will be reviewed by at least two independent reviewers. Reviewers will be selected based on their historical experience in reviewing manuscripts or based on their area of specialization double blind review is used for each text where reviewers and authors alike do not know each other's identities.
The review process will consider novelty, objectivity, methods, scientific impact, conclusions, and references. Based on the reviewer's recommendation the editor will send the final decision regarding the submission to the relevant author. Arthatama Editorial Board: Journal of Business Management and Accounting protects the confidentiality of all material submitted to the journal and all communications with reviewers. Author(s) must sign a Copyright Notice before the text is stated to be published. Arthatama editorial board: The Journal of Business Management and Accounting must follow the Journal's policies relating to the disclosure of conflicts of interest by the authors and reviewers.
The article review process by Arthatama: Journal of Business Management and Accounting goes through several stages:
- The author submits the manuscript
- Editor's evaluation to consider the appropriateness of the article
- Double blind peer review process
- Editor's Decision
- Confirmation to the author
Arthatama: The Journal of Business Management and Accounting publishes articles twice a year.
Open Access Policy
Arthatama: The Journal of Business Management and Accounting provides direct open access to its content with the principle that making research freely available to the public supports greater global knowledge exchange.
Article Processing Fee
Arthatama: The Journal of Business Management and Accounting will not charge any fees to the author for shipping or publication costs. After the issue is published, the author will get the issue via email and postal mail.
This is a state of publication that makes writers respect the copyright of their articles and enables us to ensure full copyright protection and to disseminate international journals. Authors are asked to transfer copyrights to ensure the widest possible dissemination of information. Notification will be sent to the relevant Author who confirms receipt of the manuscript. If citations from other copyrighted works are included, the Author must obtain written permission from the copyright owner and give credit to the source in the article.
Screening for Plagiarism
The submitted manuscript would be check for plagiarism using by Turnitin (https://www.turnitin.com/).
Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement
This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing articles in the Arthatama Journal of Business Management and Accounting, including authors, editors, peer-reviewers, and publishers (Publika Global Media).
- Publication Decisions: Based on the review report of the editorial board, the editor can accept, reject, or request modifications to the manuscript. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision. Editors have to take responsibility for everything they publish and should have procedures and policies in place to ensure the quality of the material they publish and maintain the integrity of the published record.
- Review of Manuscripts: Editor must ensure that each manuscript is initially evaluated by the editor for originality. The editor should organize and use peer review fairly and wisely. Editors should explain their peer review processes in the information for authors and also indicate which parts of the journal are peer-reviewed. Editor should use appropriate peer reviewers for papers that are considered for publication by selecting people with sufficient expertise and avoiding those with conflicts of interest.
- Fair Play: The editor must ensure that each manuscript received by the journal is reviewed for its intellectual content without regard to sex, gender, race, religion, citizenship, etc. of the authors. An important part of the responsibility to make fair and unbiased decisions is the upholding of the principle of editorial independence and integrity. Editors are in a powerful position by making decisions on publications, which makes it very important that this process is as fair and unbiased as possible.
- Confidentiality: The editor must ensure that information regarding manuscripts submitted by the authors is kept confidential. Editors should critically assess any potential breaches of data protection and patient confidentiality. This includes requiring properly informed consent for the actual research presented, consent for publication where applicable.
- Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: The editor of the Journal will not use unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript for his own research without written consent of the author. Editors should not be involved in decisions about papers in which they have a conflict of interest
- Confidentiality: Information regarding manuscripts submitted by authors should be kept confidential and be treated as privileged information. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
- Acknowledgment of Sources: Reviewers must ensure that authors have acknowledged all sources of data used in the research. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. The reviewers should notify the journal immediately if they come across any irregularities, have concerns about ethical aspects of the work, are aware of substantial similarity between the manuscript and a concurrent submission to another journal or a published article, or suspect that misconduct may have occurred during either the research or the writing and submission of the manuscript; reviewers should, however, keep their concerns confidential and not personally investigate further unless the journal asks for further information or advice.
- Standards of Objectivity: Review of submitted manuscripts must be done objectively and the reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments. The reviewers should follow journals’ instructions on the specific feedback that is required of them and, unless there are good reasons not to. The reviewers should be constructive in their reviews and provide feedback that will help the authors to improve their manuscript. The reviewer should make clear which suggested additional investigations are essential to support claims made in the manuscript under consideration and which will just strengthen or extend the work
- Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. In the case of double-blind review, if they suspect the identity of the author(s) notify the journal if this knowledge raises any potential conflict of interest.
- Promptness: The reviewers should respond in a reasonable time-frame. The reviewers only agree to review a manuscript if they are fairly confident they can return a review within the proposed or mutually agreed time-frame, informing the journal promptly if they require an extension. In the event that a reviewer feels it is not possible for him/her to complete review of manuscript within stipulated time then this information must be communicated to the editor so that the manuscript could be sent to another reviewer.
- Reporting Standards: Authors should present an accurate account of the original research performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Researchers should present their results honestly and without fabrication, falsification, or inappropriate data manipulation. A manuscript should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Manuscripts should follow the submission guidelines of the journal.
- Originality and Plagiarism: Authors must ensure that they have written entirely original work. The manuscript should not be submitted concurrently to more than one publication unless the editors have agreed to co-publication. Relevant previous work and publications, both by other researchers and the authors’ own, should be properly acknowledged and referenced. The primary literature should be cited where possible. Original wording taken directly from publications by other researchers should appear in quotation marks with the appropriate citations.
- Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publications: Author should not in general submit the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently. It is also expected that the author will not publish redundant manuscripts or manuscripts describing same research in more than one journal. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Multiple publications arising from a single research project should be clearly identified as such and the primary publication should be referenced
- Acknowledgment of Sources: Authors should acknowledge all sources of data used in the research and cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given.
- Authorship of the Paper: The authorship of research publications should accurately reflect individuals’ contributions to the work and its reporting. Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. Others who have made significant contribution must be listed as co-authors. In cases where major contributors are listed as authors while those who made less substantial, or purely technical, contributions to the research or to the publication are listed in an acknowledgment section. Authors also ensure that all the authors have seen and agreed to the submitted version of the manuscript and their inclusion of names as co-authors.
- Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: All authors should clearly disclose in their manuscript any financial or another substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
- Fundamental Errors in Published Works: If the author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in the submitted manuscript, then the author should promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
- Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects: The author should clearly identify in the manuscript if the work involves chemicals, procedures, or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use.
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.